Designing the Data Layer for AI-Driven Product and Supply-Chain Decisions
- Frugal Scientific
- Dec 15, 2025
- 5 min read

For many organizations, the intersection of product, supply chain, and AI architecture is where the battle for efficiency is won or lost. While algorithms often get the glory, the reality is that most "AI for supply chain" initiatives fail not because of the models, but because the underlying data is fragmented, late, and untrustworthy.
To move beyond simple dashboards and actually influence inventory and margin, AI models need a consistent, integrated data layer. This layer must see across SKUs, plants, suppliers, and channels in near real-time, acting as an operating fabric that connects demand signals, supply constraints, and product strategy into a single decisioning system.
From Static Reports to a Decisioning Fabric
Traditional Business Intelligence (BI) stacks were designed for backward-looking reporting, relying on nightly batch ETLs (Extract, Transform, Load) and static dashboards that were "good enough" for historical analysis. However, AI-driven decisions require a forward-looking "decisioning fabric".
This fabric must ingest, normalize, and serve data continuously across planning, sourcing, manufacturing, logistics, and commercial systems. Instead of adding just another analytics layer, the goal is to create an environment where data, models, and business rules coexist to drive specific outcomes like service levels, margin optimization, or cash flow preservation.
Core Requirements: Completeness, Consistency, and Latency
An AI-ready data layer must solve three fundamental problems to be effective:
Completeness: It must capture all relevant entities and events across the value chain, including external predictive signals like weather, macro indicators, and social demand signals.
Consistency: Rigorous master data management is required to ensure concepts like "one product" and "one customer" exist uniformly across ERP, WMS, TMS, PLM.
Latency: The refresh cycle must move from weekly or daily batches to near real-time for any data where freshness impacts decision quality.
Architecture: The Lakehouse Convergence
While there is no single "right" pattern, successful data layers often converge on a Lakehouse architecture. This combines the flexibility of a data lake with the governance and performance of a data warehouse.
Storage Tier: Raw, high-volume telemetry—such as IoT sensor streams, clickstreams, and unstructured documents—lands in scalable, low-cost storage.
Semantic Layer: Curated, analytics-ready tables are built on top with well-defined contracts for schemas and Service Level Agreements (SLAs).
This separation allows teams to experiment quickly while protecting the curated datasets essential for running planning and execution models.
Modelling Key Data Domains
At the heart of the data layer are well-structured domains mapped to real supply-chain decisions:
Product Master Data: Modeled with attributes vital for operations and AI, such as pack hierarchies, substitution rules, lead times, shelf life, and regulatory flags.
Supply and Logistics: Captures routings, capacity, constraints, carrier performance, and cost-to-serve at the lane or route level, rather than just in aggregate.
Demand and Customer: Unifies orders, returns, promotions, and channel behaviour into a granular history that powers both forecasting and price-pack architecture decisions.
Ingestion: Building the Digital Twin
Robust ingestion from core transactional systems creates the backbone of the data layer. This includes orders and financials from ERPs; logistics events from WMS and TMS; product data from PLM; and machine health signals from IoT devices.
To ensure models see an accurate "digital twin" of the physical supply chain, ingestion pipelines should be designed with change-data-capture, idempotency, and replay capabilities. This ensures reliability even when upstream systems are unstable or evolving.
The Role of the Feature Store
For AI-driven decisions, a Feature Store is the most practical abstraction on top of the data layer. Instead of exposing raw tables, it offers reusable, versioned features—such as "7-day demand velocity by SKU-location" or "supplier on-time-in-full rate". This approach decouples model development from low-level data engineering, enforcing consistency between training and inference and creating a stable catalog of decision signals.
Master Data, Governance, and Quality
Master data issues are often the biggest barrier to AI success. Inconsistent product codes or location hierarchies lead to "garbage-in-garbage-out" models. The data layer must own a "golden record" for products, suppliers, and locations, encoding relationships like item-to-bill-of-material so models can reason across aggregation levels without manual mapping.
Strong governance is equally critical to prevent the data layer from becoming a swamp.
Data Contracts: Agreements between source systems and the data layer protect downstream models from silent failures.
Observability: Dashboards should monitor not just data quality (volume, distribution) but also feature drift, alerting leaders when a model's inputs no longer resemble its training data.
Closing the Loop: From Data to Execution
AI is only valuable when it shapes execution. The data layer must support bi-directional integration. Forecast outputs and recommended orders should flow back into ERP and APS systems in machine-readable formats. Conversely, execution feedback—such as realized service levels and actual lead times—must flow back into the data layer to continuously recalibrate the models.
Future Directions: The Decision OS
Ultimately, a robust data layer allows an organization to treat AI not as a series of isolated pilots, but as a "Decision Operating System". As this foundation matures, it enables advanced capabilities like autonomous planning agents and digital twins. It also paves the way for generative interfaces, allowing planners to query the state of the supply chain in natural language and test scenarios instantly.
Defining Logistics Data for the AI Era
In the context of a modern, AI-driven supply chain, Logistics Data is far more than just shipment tracking numbers and delivery timestamps. It represents the digital quantification of the physical movement of goods, modelled at a granularity that allows algorithms to optimize flow, cost, and speed.
To support decisioning rather than just reporting, logistics data must be captured at the lane or route level, avoiding the trap of high-level averages that obscure critical inefficiencies.
A robust logistics data domain typically encompasses three distinct layers:
Network & Constraints: This includes the static and semi-static definitions of the physical network, such as shipping lanes, hub locations, vehicle capacity limits, and route restrictions. It defines the "physics" of what is possible within the supply chain.
Operational Telemetry: This is the dynamic, high-velocity data flowing from WMS (Warehouse Management Systems) and TMS (Transportation Management Systems). It includes real-time inventory positions, carrier performance metrics, warehouse processing times, and IoT signals regarding condition or location.
Economic Factors: Crucial for margin-aware AI, this layer captures the "cost-to-serve" for every move. It breaks down freight costs, duties, handling fees, and expediting charges, allowing models to weigh the financial impact of a logistics decision against service level requirements.
By unifying these layers, logistics data transforms from a record of "what happened" into a predictive input that enables dynamic reorder points, accurate promise dates, and automated routing adjustments.
At Frugal Scientific, we specialize in bridging the gap between abstract AI concepts and operational reality. Our approach on solution elements focuses on deploying the specific "decisioning fabrics" described above—ensuring your data layer is not just a storage sink, but an active engine for business value.

Comments